The public’s growing understanding of the damaging health effects of secondhand smoke has led to increased concern in preventing unwanted exposure to secondhand smoke in apartment buildings.
More and more tenants are voicing concerns that the tobacco smoke produced by neighbors is seeping into their own homes, often causing annoyance, discomfort, and sometimes, illness. These concerns are best resolved amicably, through discussion and reconciliation between neighbors and building managers. However, when this is not possible, legal action may be warranted.
Such legal actions have been brought across the United States, sometimes leading to out-of-court settlements, other times to verdicts in favor of one of the parties.
The following are possible legal options available to you if you are exposed to secondhand smoke:
Common Law Theories. These are claims that may be available to a non-smoker suffering from exposure to secondhand smoke. Claims may be viable against the offending neighbor, the landlord or both.
Maryland has joined with other courts across the country and upheld numerous smoking restrictions. Here are some relevant opinions:
Click here to read a sample of cases decided in favor of the non-smoker
Americans with Disabilities Act and Fair Housing Act. Non-smoking tenants who are afflicted with breathing disorders may use the Americans with Disabilities Act and/or the Fair Housing Act to bring legal action against landlords for not making reasonable accommodations to protect these tenants from secondhand smoke in common areas or in their apartments.
Other Possible Legal Action: